I will be reposting or updating some posts I've made over the years.
This topic is one that tends to come back once in a while.
As an investor, I don't want Co-CEOs.
Some folks love the idea, and it can work in some instances.
But what I want, is to know who to shoot first. Whose head is on the chopping block, and who is the ONE person I need to deal with if I want to know something will get done. If you can't respond and have your team point to the same person, then there's an issue brewing that I don't want to have to unwind. If I know there's going to be a problem after the investment, why should I make the investment beforehand?